Tire Technology International
  • News
    • A-D
      • Appointments
      • Apps
      • Awards
      • Business
      • Certification
      • Components
      • Corporate Social Responsibility
      • Data management
      • Design
      • Distribution
    • E-N
      • Education
      • Factory logistics
      • Headquarters
      • Industry 4.0
      • Investments
      • Machine Vision & Inspection
      • Manufacturing Facilities
      • Materials
      • New tires
    • O-S
      • OE Fitments
      • Partnerships
      • People
      • Regulations
      • Research & Development
      • Retreading
      • Sales facilities
      • Show News
    • S-Z
      • Simulation
      • Sustainability
      • Testing & Analysis
      • Tire Building
      • Tire handling
      • Tire Modeling & Digital Tools
      • Tire Recycling
      • TPMS & Electronics
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    • July 2023
    • March 2023
    • Annual Showcase 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • 年国际轮胎技术年刊
    • Archive Issues
    • Subscribe Free!
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Events
LinkedIn Facebook Twitter
  • Automotive Interiors
  • Automotive Testing
  • Autonomous Vehicle
  • Automotive Powertrain
  • Professional Motorsport
  • Media Pack
LinkedIn Facebook
Subscribe
Tire Technology International
  • News
      • Appointments
      • Apps
      • Awards
      • Business
      • Certification
      • Components
      • Corporate Social Responsibility
      • Data management
      • Design
      • Distribution
      • Education
      • Factory logistics
      • Headquarters
      • Industry 4.0
      • Investments
      • Machine Vision & Inspection
      • Manufacturing Facilities
      • Materials
      • New tires
      • OE Fitments
      • Partnerships
      • People
      • Regulations
      • Research & Development
      • Retreading
      • Sales facilities
      • Show News
      • Simulation
      • Sustainability
      • Testing & Analysis
      • Tire Building
      • Tire handling
      • Tire Modeling & Digital Tools
      • Tire Recycling
      • TPMS & Electronics
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    1. March/April 2025
    2. November 2024
    3. Annual Showcase 2024
    4. October 2024
    5. July 2024
    6. March 2024
    7. 年国际轮胎技术年刊
    8. Subscribe Free!
    Featured
    28th April 2025

    In this Issue – March/April 2025

    Online Magazines By Web Team
    Recent

    In this Issue – March/April 2025

    28th April 2025

    In this Issue – November 2024

    11th December 2024

    In this Issue – Annual Showcase 2024

    21st November 2024
  • Opinion
  • Videos
  • Awards
    • Tire Technology International Awards 2025
    • 2024 Winners
    • 2023 Winners
    • 2022 Winners
    • 2020 Winners
    • Previous Winners
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Events
LinkedIn Facebook
Subscribe
Tire Technology International
Features

Evaluating winter performance tire data with ASTM F1650

Eric Pierce, senior project engineer, Smithers Winter Test CenterBy Eric Pierce, senior project engineer, Smithers Winter Test Center21st January 20216 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

This article is the second in a two-part series on two testing standards that can improve the data gathering and evaluation process for tire performance testing in winter conditions. Part One discussed ASTM F1572, a standardized test method for evaluating the performance of tires on snow and ice, including straight-line acceleration and braking, step steer, slalom, hill climb and road circuit handling. Part one can be read here.

On-vehicle performance testing for tires presents unique challenges when it comes to consistency. Much of this testing occurs outside of a controlled laboratory environment. Test programs can extend over days or weeks, during which time environmental and test conditions can vary significantly. For tire performance comparisons to be successful, it is paramount to investigate and adjust for systemic or bias variations. This is especially important when testing tires in winter conditions such as snow and ice. Ambient air temperature, snow temperature, solar load, snow compaction and other factors can change dramatically from hour to hour.

ASTM F1650 offers an in-depth procedure to determine and correct for significant variations in a testing environment by developing correction factors based on control tire data. This method can improve the data evaluation process for tire performance testing in winter conditions and give a means to post-process the data. ASTM F1650 has two methods for determining and correcting for variations, A and B, both of which have similar function and calculations. These methods produce different absolute traction values but provide the same relative traction ratings from a rank-order perspective. Both methods can use either two or three test samples (Tn) between control test runs (Cn).

FIGURE ONE

Method A and Method B can both be used for linear or transient error on control tires. The main difference is the control tire reference choice: Method A (figure 2) uses the first control tire run as a reference, whereas Method B (figure 3) uses an average of all control tire runs as a reference. Another difference is that Method B requires no test for statistical significance and makes corrections to all runs. Method A only makes corrections if there is significant error or drift.

Method A
Method A uses data from the first control tire as a reference point. A good evaluation will include at least five control set values (C1, C2 … C5). Plotting the control points helps to create a sense of any patterns. Figure 2 shows an example of control data with no significant trend, good precision and a coefficient of variation of less than 1%.

FIGURE TWO

FIGURE THREEThe example in Figure 2 would not need correction. However, not all data sets maintain this level of fidelity. There are several types of drift or shift that can occur in control data sets: linear, type 1 and type 2. ASTM F1650 has different mechanisms to check for and adjust significant drift depending on which type of drift has occurred, so it is crucial to accurately qualify drift.

Figure 4 shows a good representation of linear drift, meaning control values gradually increase with a slope over time.

FIGURE FOUR

To evaluate the significance of linear drift, start by calculating the correlation coefficient (Rcalc). Determine the degrees of freedom and use that to find the tabulated Rcrit using a chart provided by ASTM F1650. If the Rcalc is greater than the Rcrit, then significant drift is considered present and corrections must be applied to test tire data.

Figure 5 shows a type 1 transient shift, which occurs when there is an abrupt shift in the data that returns to the prior trend. In this example, the transient shift occurs during the C4 and C5 control runs.

FIGURE FIVE

To evaluate type 1 shifts, calculate the standard error for the main regression line excluding the offset points. Calculate the standard error for the offset points if there are four or more. If less than three offset points, then take an average. There are two methods to determine transient shift significance depending upon the number of offset points. Both methods are covered in more detail in ASTM F1650 in section 8.4.4.1.

Figure 6 shows a type 2 transient shift, which occurs when there is a shift in data that does not correct to the previous trend. In this example, the drift begins during the C5 control run.

FIGURE SIX

To evaluate a type 2 shift, calculate the standard error for each of the two trendlines. ASTM 1650 section 8.4.4.2 shows what conditions dictate whether drift is significant between the two trendlines at their point of offset.

For a drift or shift that is considered significant, ASTM F1650 section 8.5 has correction factors and an explanation on how to apply them. As seen in Figure 7, each pair of control runs (C1 and C2, C2 and C3, etc.) are summed and divided by two times the initial control reference, C1.

FIGURE SEVEN

Method B
While Method A (Figure 2) uses data from the first control tire as a reference point, Method B (Figure 3) uses an average of all control test runs as the reference point.

Method B gives the same relative traction ratings as Method A, though the absolute traction ratings can be different. There are several benefits to choosing Method B. First, using an average as opposed to a single data point is more precise. Second, corrections are only made after test completion, and there is no need to conduct statistical test of significance for trends or shifts.

Eliminating the need to check for statistical significance of drift or shifts makes for a simpler post-processing correction using Method B. This is because all test data points are corrected for. There are different methods of calculation depending upon the number of test tires between control runs. The technical standard describes correction factors for both two and three test tire sequences in ASTM F1650 section 9.3.

ASTM 1650 is an invaluable resource for product and test engineers conducting tire performance evaluations in variable conditions. Finer details not covered in this summary can be found in ASTM F1650. By using the references and tools in this specification, engineers can uncover precise, objective data needed to achieve regulatory compliance and make product development decisions.

Share. Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Email
Previous ArticleBridgestone and partner NRGene announce natural rubber genetic breakthrough
Next Article Continental manufactures its first HL code tires

Related Posts

Features

Sponsored: Wipotec’s advanced quality control sets new standards in tire manufacturing

24th February 20254 Mins Read
Features

Interview: Claire Fioretti, head of standards and regulations for connected mobility, Michelin

13th February 20257 Mins Read
Features

Interview: Goodyear’s Kanwar Bharat Singh on revolutionizing road perception for autonomous driving

27th January 20254 Mins Read
Latest News

USTMA welcomes move to overturn EPA’s revised NESHAP rules

13th May 2025

Bridgestone debuts 70% recycled and renewable demo tire

13th May 2025

Volkswagen chooses Vredestein winter tire as OE for Tiguan SUV

12th May 2025

Receive breaking stories and features in your inbox each week, for free


Enter your email address:


Supplier Spotlights
  • Flexsys
Getting in Touch
  • Contact Us
  • Meet The Editors
  • Download Media Pack
  • Free Weekly E-Newsletter
Our Social Channels
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
RELATED UKI TOPICS
  • Automotive Interiors
  • Automotive Testing
  • Autonomous Vehicle
  • Automotive Powertrain
  • Professional Motorsport
  • Media Pack
© 2025 UKi Media & Events a division of UKIP Media & Events Ltd
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Notice & Takedown Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the ...
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.

CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie records the user consent for the cookies in the "Necessary" category.
elementorneverThe website's WordPress theme uses this cookie. It allows the website owner to implement or change the website's content in real-time.

Advertisement

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.

CookieDurationDescription
OAGEOsessionOpenX sets this cookie to avoid the repeated display of the same ad.
OAID1 yearCookie set to record whether the user has opted out of the collection of information by the AdsWizz Service Cookies.
test_cookie15 minutesdoubleclick.net sets this cookie to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE5 months 27 daysYouTube sets this cookie to measure bandwidth, determining whether the user gets the new or old player interface.
YSCsessionYoutube sets this cookie to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.
yt-remote-connected-devicesneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the user's video preferences using embedded YouTube videos.
yt-remote-device-idneverYouTube sets this cookie to store the user's video preferences using embedded YouTube videos.
yt.innertube::nextIdneverYouTube sets this cookie to register a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
yt.innertube::requestsneverYouTube sets this cookie to register a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.

Analytics

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

CookieDurationDescription
CONSENT2 yearsYouTube sets this cookie via embedded YouTube videos and registers anonymous statistical data.
_ga1 year 1 month 4 daysGoogle Analytics sets this cookie to calculate visitor, session and campaign data and track site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognise unique visitors.
_ga_*1 year 1 month 4 daysGoogle Analytics sets this cookie to store and count page views.

Functional

Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.

CookieDurationDescription
__cf_bm30 minutesCloudflare set the cookie to support Cloudflare Bot Management.

SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by